Skip to content

Monstrous atrocity, barely a whisper

November 2, 2010

Our Lady of Salvation Catholic Church, Baghdad Iraq

An entire Iraqi Catholic congregation was taken hostage by Islamic extremists during a mass Sunday night.

The death toll reached 58 by morning, which includes terrorists, Iraqi special forces and the Christian hostages, along with 78 who were injured (these are not “cuts and bruises” injuries, they are “missing limbs” injuries).

An excerpt from the news article:

Shortly before sunset, the gunmen drove a black Jeep Cherokee to the church. They blew it up, destroying their getaway car, and set off four small bombs in the neighborhood. In a brief shootout at the nearby Iraq stock exchange, the militants wounded two policemen.

Seven or eight militants then charged through the front doors of the church, interrupting the evening Mass service. They rushed down the aisle, brandishing their machine guns and spraying the room with bullets.

They ordered the priest to call the Vatican to demand the release of Muslim women who they claimed were being held captive by the Coptic church in Egypt. When the priest said he could not do that, the gunmen shot him and turned their guns on the congregation, killing most of those in the front pew.

One woman told investigators she survived only because her father wrapped himself around her body in a shield that ultimately killed him.

During the next three hours, Iraqi military officials tried to negotiate with the insurgents who refused to back off their demands. The gunmen also called reporters from the Egypt-based satellite TV al-Baghdadiya channel. The channel’s Baghdad office went off the air Monday in a dispute with Iraqi authorities about their role in the incident.

“I only heard people weeping, probably because they were hurt and in pain,” said Rauf Naamat, one of the worshippers. “Most people were too afraid to produce a sound. They feared militants would kill them, if they heard them.”

More than three hours into the attack, Iraqi security forces turned off the lights. Naamat said he could hear a voice telling parishioners: “We are Iraqi forces. Stand up and keep quiet. We will save you.”

He said he saw a militant approach the security forces as they made their way to the altar. The man then detonated his explosives vest, unleashing a massive blast.

There were conflicting accounts of anywhere from one to seven gunmen blowing themselves up. According to two security officials, most of the deaths took place in the basement where a gunman killed about 30 hostages when Iraqi forces began to enter the church. One official said the gunman set off an explosives vest he was wearing, but the other said the gunman threw two grenades at his hostages.

This is by far the most disturbing thing I have read in quite some time, and yet the fact that the NY (Oops, SF* Thanks Uncle Brian!)  Giants won the World Series seems to be more important to various news outlets than this tragic affair.

More dreadful than the attack is the thought that the US may have caused this by eliminating Saddam Hussein’s regime, in which Christians reportedly enjoyed much greater respect and security.

Grieving and afraid, Iraqi Christians said Monday they may now join what Catholic officials estimate is more than 1 million fellow worshippers who have been driven out of the country by Islamic militants since the 2003 fall of Saddam Hussein’s regime.

[…]

The number of Arab Christians has plummeted across the Mideast in recent years as many seek to move to the West. The exodus has been particularly stark in Iraq, where Christians historically made up a large portion of the country’s middle class, including key jobs as doctors, engineers, intellectuals and civil servants.

One wonders what magnitude the actions of the Islamic Militants must attain before this ferocious hunger for destruction will pique the curiosity of the media… Maybe a plane or two will be involved?

Eternal rest grant unto them, O Lord, and let perpetual light shine upon them. May their souls, and the souls of all the faithful departed, through the mercy of God, rest in peace. Amen.

-Matt

7 Comments leave one →
  1. November 2, 2010 11:41 pm

    well written

  2. Brian permalink
    November 3, 2010 2:05 pm

    This terrible thing that has happened deserves to be brought to the world so they may know that there are those in the world who would kill all Christians for their beliefs. It disturbs me that anyone would assume that these terrorists would not exist without, or that the United States Government had somehow created them with our actions. Actions to remove a genocidal dictator from an insanely lawless haven of terrorists in a very sensitive part of the world. Actions initiated on 9/11.

    If you were of the world, the world would love its own, yet because you are not of the world, but I chose you out of the world, therefore the the world hates you. John 15:18

    • November 3, 2010 7:15 pm

      It disturbs me as well, but as Colin points our in the following comment, the views of the author of the article on Yahoo are somewhat detached. I was merely commenting on the article itself, almost musing out loud. Thanks for the comment, and for the correction! 😛

  3. Colin permalink
    November 3, 2010 3:47 pm

    “More dreadful than the attack is the thought that the US may have caused this by eliminating Saddam Hussein’s regime, in which Christians reportedly enjoyed much greater respect and security.”

    I have been mulling this blog over in my head since you’ve posted it. I’ve been trying to articulate a regulated response to that particular statement because I found it disturbing that you place blame on the U.S. involvement in Iraq. You state that Christians lived better under Hussein, however what about the Iraqi people on a whole? They were the victims of random kidnappings, rape, murder, torture and not to mention the Halabja gas attack on Iraqi civilians. Google that and look up photos and tell me that Hussein didn’t need to be removed.

    Now granted this attack on Christians might not have occurred under a terror ridden Hussein rule, however without a doubt there would still be orchestrated attacks such as 9/11, the London Metro bombing and the Dubai attacks, perhaps even increased attacks with him still in power.

    With all due respect I feel that your statement regarding the U.S. to blame for this attack is immature, disturbing and ungrounded. It is something I would expect to hear from a radical left wing news source.

    • November 3, 2010 7:49 pm

      Colin,
      You are correct on all accounts. Sorry to mislead you in my thinking, but I was merely commenting on the article (I also meant to put a URL of the actual article in the post, but it seems to have not been included, mea culpa). In no way do I think this world would be better with Saddam Hussein still in control of Iraq.

      I do not think that the US is to blame for this attack. I did not mean to imply that in the post. Re-reading it, I can see how my thoughts on the matter would easily be misinterpreted. I don’t want to get into the semantics of the sentence in question, but my revised sentence is this: “The thought that this tragedy (according to the article on Yahoo news) could be directly correlated to the downfall of Saddam Hussein’s Iraq is more troubling than the actual tragedy (putting all of Saddam’s atrocious acts aside), because the US brought about the downfall of that regime.”

      It is troubling because it brings into question the moral ramifications of the actions of the US in regards to the war. Would the world be a more peaceful place if Saddam were still in power? Probably not. Would these Christians still be alive if Saddam were still in power? Probably not. BUT, the fact that they are dead now after the US has become unequivocally involved *could* put *some* of the blame on the US. Would that blame exist had we not intervened? Yes, to some degree. By our inaction in the time of need, we could be considered somewhat culpable for this act. So I guess in my opine, we were damned either way.

      I apologize if this reply seems to convey both sides, and if my statements in the post seem immature, disturbing and ungrounded… I am still trying to figure out if I support the war or not, and putting my sentiments on the blogosphere tends to get healthy criticism, which in turn helps me form my opinions. So, thanks for the comment! I really appreciate you putting time and thought into your response.

      Btw, the source was from Yahoo… I don’t really know if they are considered a radical left wing news source or not, but therein might lie the rub.

  4. November 5, 2010 4:07 pm

    Kristi here. I came across this article by the New York Times and thought it applicable. It takes an interesting approach.

Leave a comment